blushimages.com

Just another WordPress weblog

Adobe launches new product based on Alfresco

21 Aug 2010

The newly revamped Adobe Share (beta) 1.3.5 is out today and is based on Alfresco, everyone’s favorite open source ECM (enterprise content management) platform.

The latest version of Share offers PDF creation, updated Flash previews (supports full screen mode) and improved performance. The various rendition generations are based on Adobe LiveCycle,
Creative Suite and other core technologies. Share also offers Web Services that developers could use to create desktop or online applications.

Why is this interesting?
- The fact that a bigCo like Adobe is publicly stating that they are using open source at the core of their products is fantastic (and we need alot more companies to step up publicly)

- Alfresco is proving that they (like other open source products) can go beyond an enterprise sale by doing embedded deals

Via: Note 19

Best Buy invests $2.1 billion in European phone re

21 Aug 2010

Best Buy, the largest consumer electronics retailer in the U.S., is getting into the European cell phone market by taking a stake in retailer Carphone Warehouse.

Best Buy, which operates 900 stores across the U.S., will pay $2.1 billion for half interest in Carphone Warehouse, the largest cell phone retailer in Europe.

Carphone Warehouse’s 2,400 U.S. and European stores will be included in the new joint venture. Also included in the deal are Carphone Warehouse’s Web, insurance, and airtime reselling businesses. But the company will retain full ownership of its traditional landline phone business in the U.K. and France.

The companies have already worked together on developing Best Buy Mobile, a joint venture launched in 2006 with retail stores focused on selling mobile phones. Best Buy Mobile now has 200 mobile outlets, mostly in existing Best Buy stores.

Best Buy and Carphone Warehouse have also collaborated on bringing the Geek Squad, a 24-hour computer support team, to Europe.

Nvidia CEO goes on Intel rant

21 Aug 2010

“We don’t typically like to do this. It’s just that we’ve been taking it and taking it and taking it. Every single frickin’ day. Are you allowed to say that word? Every day all over the world. Enough is enough.”

Nvidia CEO and co-founder Jen-Hsun Huang let rip with a diatribe against Intel at Nvidia’s financial analyst day on Thursday. Huang cited frustration with recent Intel comments stating that discrete graphics cards will become “unnecessary.”

Intel also has plans to bring out a graphics engine code-named Larrabee that uses “many cores” to take on high-end engineering and scientific applications. And presumably games too.

Huang also attacked Intel’s marketing machine. “Just because they have this enormous marketing budget. Just because they have platforms everywhere in the world. It doesn’t make it right. To take on smaller companies. It’s just not right.”

“(It’s) one of the most important apps. I play games. A lot more people play games today than before. It’s a big industry. We happen to think games are important. Game developers are important. Game players are important. Online games, important. Retail games, important. First person shooters, important. Simulation games, important. I’m a perfectly grown adult. I’m not ashamed of them.”

This image of Intel as an unstoppable graphics juggernaut is what Huang takes issue with. What set him off initially was a comment from an Intel graphics and gaming technologist who said that consumers “probably won’t need” discrete cards in the future. Nvidia’s primary business is designing and supplying graphics chips for discrete graphics cards that go into PCs.

“Claim after claim after claim. They’re just false. They cross the line of fair play,” he said. “Here’s another one. Nvidia’s gonna be dead. Because we’re (Intel) sticking the graphics in the CPU and (Nvidia) will have no place to stick it,” he said.

Huang was especially upset about Intel’s claims of boosting integrated graphics performance in the future, saying Intel’s claims paled against what Nvidia will achieve by that time.

(Note: A contrarian take on the graphics market states that Nvidia remains the #1 graphics supplier because approximately 73 million Intel integrated graphics processors (IGP) are unused in systems due to “double-attach” with an Nvidia solution, according to Doug Freedman of American Technology Research. More here at ExtremeTech.)

(Credit:
Nvidia)

Huang also mounted an aggressive defense of gaming on the PC–one of the main reasons many consumers opt for Nvidia graphics chips. He began by claiming that Intel graphics can’t run games. “We’re not the only ones saying this. This is Tim Sweeney. One of the most important game developers in the entire world. ‘Intel is incapable of running modern games. Intel’s integrated graphics just don’t work. I don’t think they will ever work.’ This wasn’t said in 1994. This was said on March 10, 2008,” Huang said.

When asked to comment, Intel spokesman Dan Snyder said, “Are you surprised? Nvidia’s CEO has been very vocal about their feelings for several months now, so I don’t think any of this comes as a surprise.”

Because Intel, the world’s largest chipmaker, includes integrated-graphics silicon in most of its chipsets the company has become the world’s largest supplier of graphics chips. Its upcoming Nehalem processors will move the graphics from the chipset onto the same piece of silicon as the main processor. A design that is expected to result in vastly better performance.

Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang

Nvidia, AMD stances differ on new memory technolog

20 Aug 2010

AMD announced Tuesday that it will adopt the first commercial implementation of Graphics Double Data Rate, version 5 (GDDR5) memory in its forthcoming next generation of ATI Radeon graphics board products. (See: AMD: We’re first with GDDR5 memory)

While AMD is touting next-generation memory for its upcoming graphics products, Nvidia is being more circumspect.

He added that GDDR4 did not always perform as well in the market as other interfaces.

“We aren’t particularly attached to any given interface technology,” Wagner said. Nvidia does support GDDR3 in its products but did not use the GDDR4 interface. Wagner said Nvidia didn’t use GDDR4 because “at the end of the day, we built a better architecture and better product line and were able to attach a better price-performance memory to it.”

Nvidia may use GDDR5 if the segment calls for it, Wagner said. “If it looks like it makes sense for some segments of our business, we would adopt it.”

“The higher data rates supported by GDDR5–up to 5x that of GDDR3 and 4x that of GDDR4–enable more bandwidth over a narrower memory interface, which can translate into superior performance delivered from smaller, more cost-effective chips,” AMD said in a statement.

Qimonda said it collaborated with AMD. “Qimonda has worked closely with AMD to ensure that GDDR5 is available in volume to best support AMD’s next-generation graphics products,” said Thomas Seifert, Chief Operating Officer of Qimonda AG in a statement.

The new AMD boards will be based on AMD HD 4850 and 4870 graphics chips, as widely reported.

Nvidia will announce its next-generation GeForce GTX 260 and GTX 280 graphics chips in mid-June, according to sources familiar with Nvidia’s plans.

Memory chipmakers Qimonda, Hynix, and Samsung are shipping chips using the JEDEC-specified GDDR5 interface.

Nvidia is supporting the technology but taking a more cautious approach. The Santa Clara, CA-based graphics chipmaker is a vice chair in the GDDR5 task group, said Barry Wagner, director of technical marketing at Nvidia. “We’re involved in the specification of GDDR5 so if we want to build products around it, at least the spec is architected in a way that we would be content with,” Wagner said.

AMD also cited GDDR5 for stream processing: “In addition to the potential for improved gaming and PC application performance, GDDR5 also holds a number of benefits for stream processing, where GPUs are applied to address complex, massively parallel calculations.”

UrbanDaddy heads south to Miami

19 Aug 2010

Since the new-media press has been gushing about e-newsletter start-ups for the past few hours, here’s another tidbit: UrbanDaddy, a daily missive about luxury culture for the young and hedonistic, is set to announce its Miami regional edition, adding to New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and a “Jetset” travel edition. (For the record, that’s “daddy” as in “mack daddy,” as this e-newsletter clearly has zilch to do with parenting.)

It’s likely that a sizeable portion of UrbanDaddy’s readership can’t actually afford the bottle-service nightclubs, private islands in the Baltic, and travel packages to eco-friendly Caribbean golf resorts that are detailed in its daily e-mails. But the company can score advertisements from high-end fashion and liquor brands that are within reach of the guys who want Ferraris, and that’s what brings in the cash. (The site has not disclosed revenues.)

UrbanDaddy also operates a small men’s fashion blog, Kempt.

UrbanDaddy, which has about 315,000 subscribers and says it’s doubling that year-over-year, is particularly notable for two quirky reasons: one, you have to be referred by a friend to join, which puts a choke on viral growth and keeps subscriber numbers on the low end, but gives it cachet. Two, it’s a New York-based newsletter start-up that’s never been affiliated with the Pilot Group–more unusual than you might think. That investment firm, headed by former MTV and AOL exec Bob Pittman, has quite the penchant for the newsletter niche: it took a majority stake in and then flipped Ideal Bite to Disney earlier this year, and reportedly has just sold DailyCandy to Comcast for $125 million.

Sony flagship Alpha 900 DSLR breaks cover

16 Aug 2010

Size: If there’s one thing I learned in design school, it’s to take photos of handheld products using someone with hands that make the product appear the size you want it to be. In other words, small hands make a product look bigger, and vice versa. Well, either the person holding the camera in these shots has small hands, or this is one gigantic camera! Hard to tell how it scales compared to the big Canons and Nikons, but it’s clear it’s a beast. No doubt stoutly made, however, for its intended professional use. Unlike Nikon and Canon, Sony have opted not to build the battery grip into the body, so that may actually allow for a lower weight than the competition if you don’t need the grip all the time.

(Credit: Master Chong)

Sensor: Holy moly, a 25 megapixel full frame sensor! Be sure to bring lots of memory cards, because you are going to fill them up fast, especially if shooting RAW (and as a pro, why wouldn’t you be?). This is twice as big as the 12.2MP sensor in the competing Nikon D3, currently the darling of the photo forums. There’s got to be some serious computing horsepower going on inside the body, too, to process those enormous image files at a frame rate that is required for a pro-level camera. Presumably there are multiple card slots in the body, and perhaps extras in the optional battery grip.

There are a few noteworthy things:

It’s good to see Sony sticking with the SLR business though, there was a lot of skepticism when it bought out the Minolta range and re-badged it that they would have the patience required for this market. Check out more photos at Master Chong

Sony Alpha 900

Live View: Sony’s implementation of Live View in its entry-level A350 has been widely reviewed as the best approach so far, making it truly useful. (Lots of people dismiss Live View on a DSLR — “That’s what the viewfinder is for!” they say — but the fact is that looking at a screen from a distance rather than up against the viewfinder does have its uses, even for pros who often have to hold cameras above their heads to get a shot through a crowd.) The A900 brings Live View to a pro model camera in a similarly useful way.

Pentaprism: The A900 sports a decidedly retro looking pentaprism (the block of mirrored glass that sits above the lens and sends the image into the viewfinder) that iconically takes the old angular turret look of famous pro cameras like the Nikon F3 and plops it onto a modern ergo-curvy body. It’s a rather odd combination, and doesn’t work to my eyes. Many people will probably say, who cares what it looks like as long as it takes great photos? And there is something to that. But for a tool that is about creating aesthetics, I’ve always believed that the tools themselves should be beautiful. And if you look at the classic cameras of the past, even the professional ones, they were always beautiful in their own way (F3, Leicas, Rolleiflexes, Canon T90, etc.). Beautiful doesn’t have to mean Ferrari-sleek, but it does mean that the designs are coherent and have a sense of “inevitability” about them. The A900 does not have that, it looks cobbled together.

Continuing their march upward in digital SLRs, Sony has for the first time allowed a hands-on look at a prototype of their Alpha 900. They had previously shown it “under glass” at photo shows.

Microsoft makes Windows 7 name final

16 Aug 2010

In a blog posting, general manager Mike Nash said that the next version of Windows will retain its
Windows 7 code-name when it is released to the market–a date currently pegged as late 2009 or early 2010.

“For me, one of the most exciting times in the release of a new product is right before we show it to the world for the first time,” Nash wrote. “In a few weeks we are going to be talking about the details of this release at the PDC and at WinHEC. We will be sharing a pre-beta ‘developer only release’ with attendees of both shows and giving them the first broad in-depth look at what we’ve been up to.”

“Simply put, this is the seventh release of Windows, so therefore “Windows 7″ just makes sense,” Nash wrote.

Click here for more news on Windows 7.

Microsoft has said precious little about what’s actually in Windows 7. In a May interview, engineering chief Steven Sinofsky said it would use the same driver structure and underpinnings as Vista. The software maker has also talked about its multitouch capability.

“Over the years, we have taken different approaches to naming Windows,” Nash wrote. “We’ve used version numbers like Windows 3.11, or dates like Windows 98, or ‘aspirational’ monikers like Windows XP or Windows Vista. And since we do not ship new versions of Windows every year, using a date did not make sense. Likewise, coming up with an all-new ‘aspirational’ name does not do justice to what we are trying to achieve, which is to stay firmly rooted in our aspirations for Windows Vista, while evolving and refining the substantial investments in platform technology in Windows Vista into the next generation of Windows.”

Nash said the decision to stick with the Windows 7 name is “about simplicity.”

Microsoft plans to give developers at the Professional Developer Conference later this month a pre-beta version of the software.

For the first time in recent memory, Microsoft has chosen to stick with its code name for a final Windows release.

White House picks tech entrepreneur for security p

16 Aug 2010

In the book The Starfish and the Spider: The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Organizations, which he co-authored with Ori Brafman, Beckström wrote about the power of decentralized networks in organizations. He has gone so far as to say the concepts he outlined in the book could help the U.S. government in its dealings with al-Qaida.

Rod Beckström, 47, is expected to be appointed to the post Thursday and report directly to Michael Chertoff, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, according to reports in The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post. The secretive center was created by a national security directive signed by President Bush in January.

A Silicon Valley entrepreneur has been chosen to run the new National Cyber Security Center, an agency charged with coordinating efforts to protect the federal government’s computer networks from cyberattacks, according to published reports.

Beckström co-founded CATS Software, a derivatives and risk management software company, in his garage when he was 24, according to his Web site. He recently co-founded Twiki.net, a company that supports open-source wikis.

Desktop virtualization is inevitable

16 Aug 2010

Desktop virtualization could be a win-win. IT gets operational simplicity and security while users get freedom of choice.

1. Complexity
Since the introduction of the IBM PC in the 1980s, we’ve yet to figure out how to manage thousands of distributed PCs, let alone mobile laptops. Desktop virtualization could make this a heck of a lot easier when administrators manage desktop images in a data center rather than chase physical devices around the globe.

2. Security
Unless you work at some nouveau fascist organization, you can’t go locking down endpoints or imposing draconian security rules on users. Desktop virtualization could solve this quandary. How? Users would have one virtual desktop image with certain policies and privileges for work and another for personal use. Want to take a look at the latest Beyonce video on YouTube from your office? No problem. Switch over to your personal desktop and go ahead.

At the risk of sounding like an IT marketing cliche, desktop virtualization could be a win-win. IT gets operational simplicity and security while users get freedom of choice. With virtualization in place, users can bring in their familiar Macs and do their jobs without a hitch. Sure, the burden goes to the data center and the network, but aren’t we headed in that direction anyway?

Everyone in the IT industry is doing back flips over server virtualization, begging the obvious question: What about the desktop?

3. Mobility
Pretty soon, I’m going to want the same desktop image on different PCs and other devices. Desktop virtualization is the best bet to deliver on this promise.

There is already a lot of tire kicking going on. According to ESG Research, 8 percent of large organizations have already deployed desktop virtualization, 9 percent are piloting desktop virtualization, and 32 percent are currently evaluating desktop virtualization.

Yup, the industry is about to go ga-ga over virtualization again. Desktop virtualization makes a ton of sense because of:

On Mars, the Phoenix has landed

16 Aug 2010

NASA said that it expects to learn the status of the solar arrays later Sunday night, along with information on whether the stereo camera and weather station have been moved into their deployed positions, as Phoenix relays signals via the Mars Odyssey orbiter. The first attempt to use the 7.7-foot robotic arm will come in a couple of days.

The mission on Mars
Phoenix is taking up residency in the north polar region of Mars, where researchers expect it to find “ice-rich permafrost” underneath the rocky, dusty surface. In 2002, the Mars Odyssey orbiter indicated that there could be large amounts of subsurface water ice in that area.

NASA said Sunday evening that radio signals have been received from the Phoenix spacecraft on the surface of Mars.

At midday Sunday, NASA said things were accelerating: “The spacecraft’s speed relative to Mars increased from 6,300 miles per hour at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time to 8,500 mph at 12:30 p.m., headed for a speed higher than 12,000 mph before reaching the top of the Martian atmosphere.”

How's the weather on Mars? In the days just before Phoenix's arrival, a dust cloud passed over the landing area but Sunday's descent was expected to take place in clear Martian skies.

Shockley joked in his blog about the spacecraft’s energy efficiency. “At a time when gas prices are soaring,” he wrote, “Phoenix is getting good fuel economy at about 2 million miles per gallon.”

The Phoenix Mars Lander is the latest embodiment of humankind’s quest to learn whether life might once have been sustainable on the Red Planet and to prepare for eventual human exploration there.

Updated 6:31 PM PDT with initial information from the arrival of Phoenix on Mars and then again at 7:20 PM PDT with one of the first images from the lander. That follows an earlier update to reflect the Phoenix lander’s acceleration as it approached Mars and to clarify its speed and course in traveling through space.

This screen grab from NASA TV is a raw, or unprocessed, image taken Sunday by the Phoenix lander on Mars.

Water on Mars exists only in solid and gaseous form, though previous missions to and around the planet have suggested that it once flowed in liquid form–as recently, NASA says, as about 100,000 years ago.

“The spacecraft is in good health,” Brent Shockley, Phoenix configuration and information management engineer at NASA, wrote in the Phoenix Mars Lander blog on Saturday. On Sunday, NASA reported that it had decided not to make any final adjustment to the spacecraft’s trajectory.

Artist's montage shows NASA's Phoenix spacecraft en route to and landing on Mars. For a gallery of images of the lander, click on the picture.

In the final day or two before landing, all was well.

In entering the thin Martian atmosphere and heading to the surface, Phoenix faced these tribulations: “aeroshell braking” via friction with the atmosphere that would heat it to thousands of degrees, a parachute opening that would give the lander a hard jerk to slow it further, and pulsing retrorockets tasked with making a soft touchdown.

Scientists are also hoping that Phoenix can help determine “habitability” properties of the soil such as pH and saltiness.

In its approach to Mars, the vehicle had been traveling at an incredibly high rate of speed–though exactly how fast depends on the point of reference. Shockley wrote Friday: “Phoenix is currently traveling 75,400 miles per hour with respect to Earth. With respect to the sun, however, Phoenix is traveling 44,300 miles per hour. With respect to Mars, Phoenix is traveling a modest 6,090 miles per hour.”

The lander is now about 170 million miles from Earth–after having traveled 422 million miles through space after liftoff from Earth in August.

(Credit:
NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona/MSSS )

But before it can dig into the surface, Phoenix first had to traverse the Martian atmosphere. Those seven minutes of descent, the very last leg of the months-long journey, are what could have been the killer: the lander, its developers say, faced “seven minutes of terror” before touching down. Of 11 total previous attempts by several nations to put a spacecraft on Mars, according to NASA, only five had been successful.

Using its robotic arm, Phoenix will dig into the surface to bring up both soil and ice. In its platform structure, the lander will then analyze those samples to help scientist on Earth create models of Mars’ historic climate and to predict future atmospheric conditions.

“We’ve passed the hardest part and we’re breathing again, but we still need to see that Phoenix has opened its solar arrays and begun generating power,” Barry Goldstein, Phoenix project manager at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said in a statement Sunday. Batteries are providing power at the moment.

Even with a successful landing and initial operation, the Phoenix machinery isn’t likely to have more than a short-term mission. Besides simply operating in the extreme cold of the Martian arctic and facing a potential onslaught of dust storms, it is not expected to get back into operation after the Martian winter when its solar panels will be rendered ineffective by complete darkness.

The Stereo Surface Imager atop the lander, meanwhile, will produce panoramic images of the surface with a resolution of 1,024 x 1,024 pixels.

(Credit:
NASA)

(Credit:
NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)

Because it takes 15 minutes for signals to travel between Mars and Earth, Phoenix was designed to land autonomously. The confirming signal came shortly before 5:00 p.m. PDT Sunday.

That said, no one expected the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity to last more than a few months, and they ended up sending back data for a number of years.